+-

Author Topic: lt1000r  (Read 1278 times)

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • **
  • Posts: 10
  • Gender: Male
  • I am 38 years old and loves the lt500&lt250r's
  • Location: hurley, virginia
lt1000r
« on: September 23, 2014, 06:06:40 am »
Hi guys this is a little motorhead dream that i used to have and still do for 20 some years now. could you iamgine if suzuki would come up with a lt1000r  limited edition model and have it look very much like to 90 model and be twin cylinder and have the same bore and stroke and have the chassic wider and longer  just to compensate for that big engine and have the crank and bearing problem fixed could you imigime the sound that S.O.B would have with twin exhaust and power it would have.he would have to duct tape is hands to the handle bars just to hold on. well this is just a pipe dream that i wounted to share with you. o well that how things get made .

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Offline

  • Sandaholic
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Forum Moderator
  • Elite Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 1195
  • Gender: Male
  • Sandaholic / speed addict
  • Location: Yuma, Arizona
Re: lt1000r
« Reply #1 on: September 23, 2014, 09:33:03 pm »
I think a few guys here share your dream
Brian
1988 Suzuki LT-250R (The HPR test mule)
1987 Suzuki LT-500R
1990 Suzuki LT-500R
1982 Honda ATC-185S
1982 Honda ATC-250R

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Range Rover
  • *****
  • Posts: 503
Re: lt1000r
« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2014, 07:58:20 am »
would be terrible.

make it wider to fit a second jug would make it way too wide. go sit on a zilla. measure the gap between your legs, add another 10 inches to that. it would be hell on your hips.
making the engine part of the frame longer would also suck, you would have to be laying down to reach the handle bars.

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pro Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 858
Re: lt1000r
« Reply #3 on: September 24, 2014, 09:27:00 am »
Hi guys this is a little motorhead dream that i used to have and still do for 20 some years now. could you iamgine if suzuki would come up with a lt1000r  limited edition model and have it look very much like to 90 model and be twin cylinder and have the same bore and stroke and have the chassic wider and longer  just to compensate for that big engine and have the crank and bearing problem fixed could you imigime the sound that S.O.B would have with twin exhaust and power it would have.he would have to duct tape is hands to the handle bars just to hold on. well this is just a pipe dream that i wounted to share with you. o well that how things get made .

The rocking couple produced with a 180 degree twin, with two 500cc cylinders, would be very difficult to keep the vibrations to an acceptable level.  Talk to some of the Banshee engine builders that have built the 1000cc 180 deg. twins. 

Making both cylinders fire simultaneously would eliminate the rocking couple but would make the effort required to kick start it twice hard, plus the counterbalancer would have to be huge.

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Range Rover
  • *****
  • Posts: 463
Re: lt1000r
« Reply #4 on: September 24, 2014, 10:16:17 am »


Hi guys this is a little motorhead dream that i used to have and still do for 20 some years now. could you iamgine if suzuki would come up with a lt1000r  limited edition model and have it look very much like to 90 model and be twin cylinder and have the same bore and stroke and have the chassic wider and longer  just to compensate for that big engine and have the crank and bearing problem fixed could you imigime the sound that S.O.B would have with twin exhaust and power it would have.he would have to duct tape is hands to the handle bars just to hold on. well this is just a pipe dream that i wounted to share with you. o well that how things get made .

The rocking couple produced with a 180 degree twin, with two 500cc cylinders, would be very difficult to keep the vibrations to an acceptable level.  Talk to some of the Banshee engine builders that have built the 1000cc 180 deg. twins. 

Making both cylinders fire simultaneously would eliminate the rocking couple but would make the effort required to kick start it twice hard, plus the counterbalancer would have to be huge.

Fun stoppers.  >:D

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • **
  • Posts: 10
  • Gender: Male
  • I am 38 years old and loves the lt500&lt250r's
  • Location: hurley, virginia
Re: lt1000r
« Reply #5 on: September 24, 2014, 05:19:17 pm »
yes your all right. i never thought of it that way it would be a big o pile of junk i can't belive i posted something that dumb.    ::)

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Range Rover
  • *****
  • Posts: 483
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm Slow
  • Location: Hastings pa
Re: lt1000r
« Reply #6 on: September 24, 2014, 09:57:54 pm »
There are bike like that like a Scimitar that are 1000 cc's they are crazy and require a secondary starter and a massive clutch capable of handling the hp.
#820
JR Motorsports
Halls Precision Racing

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Green Horn
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
Re: lt1000r
« Reply #7 on: September 25, 2014, 12:34:38 am »
Run a F7 motor out of a Cat mated to a LT trans. You may add 4" in with, but it's a very low CG and a very good single pipe setup and you could kick start it.

Then add a fluid dampener to keep your arms from going numb. The Ultra Lite guys started using them in Rotax. We hand made one for the last 1500cc triple we made. Cat 900 twin (1010 big bore) +1 cyl.

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Range Rover
  • *****
  • Posts: 503
Re: lt1000r
« Reply #8 on: September 25, 2014, 04:45:21 am »
if you really want a twin, take out the zilla motor, drop in a 10mil serval or cheetah banshee motor. tons of HP and torque without any of the zilla issues.

 

+- Suzuki Quadracer HQ Store Zone

http://www.suzukiquadracerhq.com/index.php?action=store