+-

Author Topic: Welding Clylinder Ears ?  (Read 3536 times)

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pro Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 858
Re: Welding Clylinder Ears ?
« Reply #25 on: January 19, 2014, 01:52:07 pm »
Here's a cylinder in the process of having the ears welded. Might not look the same for every builder. These are of a guy on facebooks cylinder he did himself.





The photos show some quality welding but it appears that the built up area was totally created by welding.  Welding always creates additional stress, so always try to gain as much strength with minimal welding.  I strive to move the stress plane above the reed opening and reduce the stress riser in the plane where the base nuts seat. 

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pro Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 858
Re: Welding Clylinder Ears ?
« Reply #26 on: January 19, 2014, 02:09:08 pm »
Ive been told that detonation can cause the cracks around the ears 2c

Stress and strain causes metals to fatigue and eventually crack.  Combustion pressure, thermal expansion, and vibration produce stress.  Increasing power usually increases combustion pressure.  Detonation can create some extremely high pressure spikes superimposed on top of what ever combustion pressure is present.  The pressure spikes from detonation in a stock engine can be a lot higher than the peak combustion pressure in an engine with state of the art power levels.

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Weekend Warrior
  • ****
  • Posts: 222
Re: Welding Clylinder Ears ?
« Reply #27 on: January 19, 2014, 05:47:33 pm »
Would it be safe to run high octane on a stock engine and not weld the ears?

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Weekend Warrior
  • ****
  • Posts: 157
  • Location: Wv
Re: Welding Clylinder Ears ?
« Reply #28 on: January 19, 2014, 06:00:33 pm »
ive not weld a cylinder before but im a welder  like jerry said the less weld the less it will warp i think the main  thing is to take your time fiting the peaces in so that when u weld it it only takes 1 pass of weld and to bolt it down to a true suface and preheat it and it shouldnt warp much if any at all Im geting redy to do 1 of mine im a little slow but ill post some progress pics
87 lt500r hybrid custom intake with 48 lectron, v2 reeds, scr dune port,4'' over swinger
87 lt250 mild porting, shear pipe,v3 reeds,4''swinger
91 lt250r stocker , fmf
83 RM500 build in progress
85 465rm hybrid dune port, v3 reeds,hand con pipe ,vm 46mm carb 4'' swinger ,in progresss

Offline

  • Mitch Keller
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Administrator
  • Trail Blazer
  • *****
  • Posts: 799
  • Love The Smell Of 927 and Race Fuel In The Morning
  • Location: Riverside Ca
Re: Welding Clylinder Ears ?
« Reply #29 on: January 19, 2014, 06:39:26 pm »
Had a few cylinders done in the past, they used thick wall tube, use OEM part
NUT
09159-10065, 10mm stud, cant remember the length of the stud I would have to check my notes, I was charged anywhere  from $100 to $175 depending on who I used, I dont know what HPR charges, who ever you use make sure it is someone that has done many lT500 cylinders and has the equipment to deck the bottom flat, you do loose a bore also, depending on the welder I seen the base decked .015" to .020" requiring AFM thicker base gasket located in the store
F Mitch Keller

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pro Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 858
Re: Welding Clylinder Ears ?
« Reply #30 on: January 19, 2014, 09:32:02 pm »
Would it be safe to run high octane on a stock engine and not weld the ears?

I would run fuel with a high enough octane level to prevent your engine and present state of tune from experiencing detonation.  This applies to any cylinder, whether it is stock or highly modified.  I would run your present cylinder until the engine needs bored or a crack appears.  Then have the ears properly reinforced. Look at the cylinder before each ride.  Dirt will start to collect in the **** area.

All of the LT500 cylinders do not have the same strength in the area that has the cracking problem.  I find contamination in the aluminum in the right rear portion of the cylinders on a lot of cylinders that break.  The contamination appears to be casting sand that washed out of the runners and collected in the area of the cylinder that cracks.  This type of problem can usually be traced to poorly designed molds, soft cores, using sand that was not prepared correctly and or unskilled foundry workers.

I feel that the cylinder design was flawed.  **** cylinders are the result of the inconsistency in the quality of the casting and the poor cylinder design. 

High octane fuel will help reduce detonation on any engine that is having a detonation problem but may not eliminate it on a poorly designed or tuned engine.  There is a ton of wrong information on web sites about how much compression you can run for a given octane fuel.

I have not found a compression number or compression ratio that is a limit for premium pump gas nor have I found a compression number or compression ratio that always requires 110 octane fuel.  I think that the majority of the information that two stroke engine builders and owners are using is just folk lore borrowed from the automotive industry. 

The majority of the automotive engines will run detonation free on 87 octane fuel.  Put a turbo on one of them and add a couple psi of boost and now we need 93 octane fuel to run detonation free.  Add more boost and now we need 100 octane fuel.  Add even more boost and now we need 115 octane fuel to run detonation free.  In this example the compression ratio or the cranking pressure was not changed but the octane requirements of the fuel went up as charge density, dynamic cylinder pressure and power increased. 

This trend is also present with two strokes.  As the overall design of the engine is improved, the engines ability to increase charge density is improved. As the charge density in a two stroke is increased, the fuel octane requirements of that engine is also raised just like when the boost on a turbocharged four stroke is increased. 

Improving the design of the cylinder head on a two stroke reduces the engine's octane requirements.  Increasing the power of a given engine usually increases the engine's fuel octane requirements.  Advancing the timing, over restricting the exhaust system, and butchering the transfer ports will usually raise the engine's fuel octane requirements without out increasing the power.

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • **
  • Posts: 42
Re: Welding Clylinder Ears ?
« Reply #31 on: January 19, 2014, 10:46:57 pm »
Explain port timjng and octane requirements for us if you dont mind. This has been a very good read and informative.

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Green Horn
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: England
Re: Welding Clylinder Ears ?
« Reply #32 on: January 20, 2014, 06:03:15 am »
Good info

So after inspecting my stripped engine I am wondering if a longer base stud is required if I weld the ears?

If so what length and where from?

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Forum Moderator
  • Elite Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 2058
Re: Welding Clylinder Ears ?
« Reply #33 on: January 20, 2014, 06:39:04 am »
I was supplied by Jerry with these. Both needed to be shortened for installation or engine rotation was hindered. Honda cr500 part.

87 HPR LT500
04 Roll LOBO II TRX250R
06 LTR450
87 LT500
85 & 86 LT250
86 & 87 TRX250R
07 & 09 Husqvarna TE450
00 CR125R

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Weekend Warrior
  • ****
  • Posts: 262
Re: Welding Clylinder Ears ?
« Reply #34 on: January 20, 2014, 10:14:22 am »
You don't NEEd longer studs. You can use two more of the long nuts like the front of cylinder.

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Green Horn
  • ***
  • Posts: 89
Re: Welding Clylinder Ears ?
« Reply #35 on: February 02, 2014, 06:36:26 am »
Mike did mine...used the same  suzuki nuts from the front..


Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Green Horn
  • ***
  • Posts: 76
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Your mamas house
Re: Welding Clylinder Ears ?
« Reply #36 on: February 06, 2014, 11:59:30 pm »
This is how I did mine. Both back studs are the same as the shorter front stud. I used a piece of 1/2 inch 6061 and spread it out further to increase the strength. Right....wrong....whatever it is working so far.

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Weekend Warrior
  • ****
  • Posts: 230
Re: Welding Clylinder Ears ?
« Reply #37 on: February 07, 2014, 06:43:26 am »
Here is an early LRD ear weld similar to the pro-x ear rib for 250r's.

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Forum Moderator
  • Elite Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 2058
Re: Welding Clylinder Ears ?
« Reply #38 on: February 07, 2014, 07:49:45 am »
Jerry's modified top end

87 HPR LT500
04 Roll LOBO II TRX250R
06 LTR450
87 LT500
85 & 86 LT250
86 & 87 TRX250R
07 & 09 Husqvarna TE450
00 CR125R

 

+- Suzuki Quadracer HQ Store Zone

http://www.suzukiquadracerhq.com/index.php?action=store