+-

Author Topic: K&N vs Foam Filter  (Read 2100 times)

Offline

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Moderator
  • Range Rover
  • ***
  • Posts: 379
  • Gender: Male
  • Its better to burn out then fade away!
  • Location: SoCal
Re: K&N vs Foam Filter
« on: October 02, 2012, 12:43:36 pm »
Here is the filter & outerwears you want to run for just about anything but Mud:

AEM Brute Force with internal supports Dryflow #: 21-2059BF
http://www.aemintakes.com/store/product.aspx?Prod=21-2059BF

If you wan to run a different filter here is the link to all of their universal dryflow filters (get a brute force (BF) with the internal support)
http://www.aemintakes.com/search/univcone.aspx

Outerwears #:20-2108  = 5.5 x 6.5 x 12
Call Ron Griffen West Coast Distributor $16.50
Auto Parts Unlimited
Tel:(909)597-8638

This set up works the best so far, no oil and only passes a very fine dust no actual sand granuals

I thought Brett had horrible results when he tried using a dry flow filter in the dunes....

As far as I remember, Brett along with others had great results using the BF dry filter.  I on the other hand had sand/dust in the intake track after one ride using the Amsoil "Nano" dry filter.

 

+- Suzuki Quadracer HQ Store Zone

http://www.suzukiquadracerhq.com/index.php?action=store