Suzuki Quadracer HQ

LT250R Quadracer => LT250R - Engine => Topic started by: Derrik on October 18, 2012, 06:40:26 pm


Title: Re: PWK Air Striker vs; Quad Vent?
Post by: Derrik on October 21, 2012, 02:52:01 pm
thanks,that settles it im now looking for a 38mm =D
Title: Re: PWK Air Striker vs; Quad Vent?
Post by: Dezsled on October 21, 2012, 08:56:04 am
Yeah I have the 38 flat slide  on my 86 250
Title: Re: PWK Air Striker vs; Quad Vent?
Post by: Derrik on October 20, 2012, 11:01:45 pm
IS ANYONE RUNNING A 38MM WITH AN UNPORTED MOTOR!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?
Title: Re: PWK Air Striker vs; Quad Vent?
Post by: Rainman56 on October 20, 2012, 11:25:13 am
I run a 38mm Mikuni in my 87 250 intake boot.Heated it slightly with a heat gun and slide it in reasonably easy.Not sure if a 39mm would fit.
Title: Re: PWK Air Striker vs; Quad Vent?
Post by: Derrik on October 20, 2012, 01:18:15 am
But will this setup work good on a motor that's just piped and reeded??
Title: Re: PWK Air Striker vs; Quad Vent?
Post by: El Diablo on October 19, 2012, 10:29:51 pm
If you run the 38 or 39 mm carburetors, you will also have to use a zilla intake manifold. That will cause your carburetor to be kicked off at an angle like on the 500's. Then you will have to run a custom airfilter setup because your stock airbox wil not line up anymore.
Title: Re: PWK Air Striker vs; Quad Vent?
Post by: Derrik on October 19, 2012, 08:05:31 pm
ohh man im still playing with the little 250's  :))

will a 38 or 39mm pwk work good with a piped and reeded 250 motor? or just get the 36mm for this setup??

Title: Re: PWK Air Striker vs; Quad Vent?
Post by: Rogue1970 on October 19, 2012, 12:42:29 pm
Well for reliability, IMO I would recommend a builder that will not remove or thin the intake bridge too much (others have the bridge removed for a few years and still on the same piston).  My intake bridge broke when I overheated my piston the last trip out (wrong fuel burn down... my fault).  Make sure the builder/porter is familiar with the LT500, so they don't screw up the porting by making it too big and it hurts performance.

Good luck getting everything all setup.
Title: Re: PWK Air Striker vs; Quad Vent?
Post by: Derrik on October 18, 2012, 07:52:25 pm
well im debateing getting it port at the moment.so im still trying to find a winning carb for my combination.

if i dont get the top end ported ill be running stock bore,q-pipe,and vforce reeds,and squish will be fixed.

im open to discussion about porting options,main focus is reliability,i dont know **** on this subject lol
Title: Re: PWK Air Striker vs; Quad Vent?
Post by: Mitch Keller on October 18, 2012, 07:08:23 pm

You did not say what size PWK your were going to be running?
 The Air Striker quad vents it (04 vents) allows excess air thats built up to escape through the vent tubes and prevents fuel slosh and is more designed for the ultracross mx crowd who jump and ride over erratic terrains.

Air Striker models have finned airfoil set of wings which direct air to the Main Nozzle for improved signal and throttle response.

Standard PWK Series Carburetors are available in 28, 33, 35, 39 an 41mm sizes. PWK Quad Vent Carburetors come in 36mm, and PWK Air Striker/Quad Vent Carbs in 35 and 38mm sizes.


 



Title: PWK Air Striker vs; Quad Vent?
Post by: Derrik on October 18, 2012, 06:40:26 pm
So I've been looking at info on carbs but it was over a broad spectrum of different bikes. the quad vent prevents build up in the whoops
apparently and the air striker provides decent mid power and the air striker quad vent is for **** mx racing with a combination of both qualities.

Its hard to find rock solid info,even more so on the LT250R.

is the air striker quad vent the "Best" of the three like it claims?