+-

Author Topic: 38 vs 42.5 mm  (Read 2878 times)

Offline Nopick

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Range Rover
  • *****
  • Posts: 463
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #50 on: November 23, 2013, 12:21:14 pm »
Yes. Stock needle and needle jet.

Offline PowerStrokin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Green Horn
  • ***
  • Posts: 76
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Your mamas house
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #51 on: November 23, 2013, 12:50:41 pm »
I had my needles backwards in my head on my last post, so I modified it. I'm running the 7dh3. I want to try the 7dh2, since it is leaner. I screwed up when I originally bought my carb and ordered the snowmobile version. I've had to change so much crap around to get it to work right. I've lost track of a lot of stuff. Being a snowmobile carb it had the 7dh2 needle originally, but I have since lost it.

I researched the differences in the two versions of the carbs and noticed the snowmobile carb had a 0.7 air jet and the bike version had a 0.5 air jet. So I went to order the 0.5, but sudco didn't have it when I tried several years ago. So I'm curious if that is part of the problem also. The thing is, I have never found clarification as to which air jet is leaner. I am certain that a physically bigger air jet is leaner, but the scale could be inverted, for all I know, to save confusion, since larger numbers usually indicate richer in a carburator. (If that makes any sense)

So which way is it? Is 0.5 richer or leaner than 0.7?

Oh and thanks for the info on the needle jet change. Looking at the mikuni manual it looks like that will have the biggest effect on the range where mine is fat. I ordered an aa-0 and a 0.5 air jet and a 7dh2 needle. I'll start playing with it after I get everything put back together.

Offline Frank

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Weekend Warrior
  • ****
  • Posts: 162
  • Gender: Male
  • who brakes later is more quickly
  • Location: Germany
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #52 on: November 24, 2013, 04:29:17 am »
But i found out the zilla runs very boggy without the 6dk3 needle on stock Carb , bore 87.5 , without portings,
PT Pipe, with air lead.
under-steers is when you see the tree the goes in. overrides is when you hear the tree which you were going on.
"Walther Röhrl "

Offline Buckeye513

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Elite Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 2493
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Cincinnati OH
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #53 on: November 24, 2013, 04:53:49 am »
Frank Powerstrokin is talking about the VM44.

Offline Glamisrider

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Forum Moderator
  • Pro Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 860
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: SoCal
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #54 on: November 24, 2013, 04:29:07 pm »
Derrick,
Back on the first page you said you'd run a lectrn if it wasn't 4-5 bills.

FYI: J-Zilla has one for sale with all the goodies in the 2 bill range.

http://www.suzukiquadracerhq.com/items-selling/lt500-parts-for-sale/



Offline Buckeye513

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Elite Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 2493
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Cincinnati OH
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #55 on: November 24, 2013, 06:40:23 pm »
I saw that Bret but that's a 44. Is the Lectron a better 44 then the Mikuni? Shearer told me to get a 50mm Lectron for drag racing that's what I was referring to when I said 4 or 5 bills or more.

Offline GrkGuy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Elite Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 2207
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: ohio
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #56 on: November 24, 2013, 10:00:52 pm »
50mm you better call Q for some port work then.
if bike does not have the hp to suck in air you will be slower with that big carb. and you will never get it jetted right.
life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sidays totally worn out shouting "HOLY SH*T...WHAT A RIDE!"

Offline Nopick

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Range Rover
  • *****
  • Posts: 463
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #57 on: November 25, 2013, 06:48:18 am »
GrkGuy recommending someone call Q for work. Something is seriously wrong with the world.  P*

Offline Buckeye513

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Elite Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 2493
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Cincinnati OH
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #58 on: November 25, 2013, 07:09:43 am »
Grk Q could offer to do the work for free and I wouldn't send him my stuff.

Offline Nopick

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Range Rover
  • *****
  • Posts: 463
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #59 on: November 25, 2013, 08:42:46 am »
That is harsh.

Offline Glamisrider

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Forum Moderator
  • Pro Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 860
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: SoCal
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #60 on: November 25, 2013, 10:03:42 am »
Grk is right on the porting, a 50mm could be used but it will only work properly on a drag ported motor especially with a lectron.

I would recommend another builder for porting but we all know how that goes.

One last point, though everyone is limited by their budget, a motor is an air pump system and you can not just buy one piece have the rest mis-matched and expect highest performance.  So buying a 50mm lectron and slapping it on a stock port motor, with a Q V-1, some v-2's and a large filter won't get you the highest performance on the drag strip or on the trails and ou'll be pissed b/c you spent good money and you're performance went down on both ends.

If you want a drag only motor have JH port the crap out of it and run a 50mm lectron.  If you want to drag & trail/dune then get a aggressive dune/drag port and get a Vm44, or a HV44 lectron (they'll cost you about the same to get and set up in the long run). 

You have to start with the end in mind otherwise you'll be chasing your tail all over the place continuing to spend $$$ until your happy. 

You seem to be like the rest of us not happy until you've got the max performance possible for what you want to do so figure out what you want gather the parts.








Offline LT500Kid

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Elite Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 1045
  • Location: Michigan
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #61 on: November 25, 2013, 10:38:15 am »
I was told once that a lectron 48 is equivalent to a 46mm on other carbs. Is that a true statement?

Offline GrkGuy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Elite Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 2207
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: ohio
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #62 on: November 25, 2013, 10:47:36 am »
i only said Q to be funny, haha lol get it. he is the only one that can build a motor like that in his eyes.
guess it went over a few heads. lol
  if you wanna go fast call jerry hall..............................................
and matt i have heard the too.
life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sidays totally worn out shouting "HOLY SH*T...WHAT A RIDE!"

Offline Dezsled

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Forum Moderator
  • Elite Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 2058
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #63 on: November 25, 2013, 11:20:42 am »
He put out a couple new vids?

 P*
87 HPR LT500
04 Roll LOBO II TRX250R
06 LTR450
87 LT500
85 & 86 LT250
86 & 87 TRX250R
07 & 09 Husqvarna TE450
00 CR125R

Offline LT500Kid

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Elite Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 1045
  • Location: Michigan
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #64 on: November 25, 2013, 11:25:13 am »
I think cr told me that up at silver lk

Offline Nopick

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Range Rover
  • *****
  • Posts: 463
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #65 on: November 25, 2013, 11:34:09 am »
i only said Q to be funny, haha lol get it. he is the only one that can build a motor like that in his eyes.
guess it went over a few heads. lol
  if you wanna go fast call jerry hall..............................................
and matt i have heard the too.

I don't think it went over anyone's head.

Offline Gillio

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pro Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 853
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Chatam NY Upstate
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #66 on: November 25, 2013, 11:39:02 am »
Who's Q??   ::)
92 LT250R- Bartlett racing prototype big bore. Wide, Low,  and studded

91 LT250R Mickey Thompson stadium racer

87 LT500R- Mostly stock

89 LT500R IceZilla, mods TBA

Offline Glamisrider

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Forum Moderator
  • Pro Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 860
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: SoCal
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #67 on: November 25, 2013, 11:44:50 am »
I was told once that a lectron 48 is equivalent to a 46mm on other carbs. Is that a true statement?
Yes and no, a HV, (high velocity) has a 2mm reduction in the center to increase the pulse. Lectron makes a regular straight and a HV, the regular has no reduction.

i only said Q to be funny, haha lol get it. he is the only one that can build a motor like that in his eyes.
guess it went over a few heads. lol

Had me worried there Grk, I thought aliens must have abducted you  [|]


Offline Motoman991

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pro Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 915
  • Location: Cincinnati, Oh
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #68 on: November 25, 2013, 12:22:46 pm »
Q?  LOL.  A legend in his own mind.

Offline Yoyodyne1

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Green Horn
  • ***
  • Posts: 68
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #69 on: November 25, 2013, 02:12:55 pm »
The zilla loves to breath! Long ago Arlen at LRD told me that in his dyno testing the vm44 mikuni put out 3hp more on the topend on a stock nonported fmf equipped zilla over a Keihin pwk39 with no hp loss on the bottom.  I'm sure with even more mods the difference becomes even greater, plus I love the look of the old school roundslide...gives more of the sleeper effect to the squids at the hill.

Offline Nopick

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Range Rover
  • *****
  • Posts: 463
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #70 on: November 25, 2013, 02:34:36 pm »
"Loves to breathe." "Likes big pipes and filters."

I think every builder I have talked to has said similar things.

Offline Dezsled

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Forum Moderator
  • Elite Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 2058
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #71 on: November 25, 2013, 06:09:20 pm »
Sorry I'm late to the swap... Does this carb bolt on to oem Zilla intake/airbox boots?

Got the black throttle tube for the gunnar gasser   :o
87 HPR LT500
04 Roll LOBO II TRX250R
06 LTR450
87 LT500
85 & 86 LT250
86 & 87 TRX250R
07 & 09 Husqvarna TE450
00 CR125R

Offline Zilla273

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Range Rover
  • *****
  • Posts: 381
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: watertown ny
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #72 on: November 25, 2013, 07:29:12 pm »
Dezled, ive heard u have to heat and stretch both the intake and filter tube to fit the vm,  2c

Offline Yoyodyne1

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Green Horn
  • ***
  • Posts: 68
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #73 on: November 25, 2013, 10:09:47 pm »
Here is a comparison photo of a stock VM44  and one I had machined down.  On the intake side of the carb I also had it shortened so the carb wasn't so long and both OD turned down, this makes life easier getting it in and out of the stock boots.  Still requires some stretching of the boots, but not nearly as much without the machining.

Offline Nopick

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Range Rover
  • *****
  • Posts: 463
Re: 38 vs 42.5 mm
« Reply #74 on: November 26, 2013, 06:56:26 am »
I have also read that turning down the OD of the carb flanges helps on some of the big carbs.

 

+- Suzuki Quadracer HQ Store Zone

http://www.suzukiquadracerhq.com/index.php?action=store